Latepost The Disclosure Dilemma: Why To A Greater Extent Than Disclosure Has Led To Less Information

The terminal iii decades guide keep been the golden historic catamenia of disclosure, equally both accounting dominion writers in addition to regulators guide keep pushed companies to reveal to a greater extent than in addition to to a greater extent than most their prospects to investors, both inwards the U.S. in addition to internationally. Some of this force tin survive attributed to to a greater extent than activist investors, demanding to a greater extent than information from companies, but much of it tin survive traced to accounting fraud/malfeasance, where companies held dorsum primal information from investors, who paid a toll equally a consequence. In response, legislators, the watchdog agencies (SEC in addition to its equivalents) in addition to the accounting rule-writers (GAAP, IFRS) guide keep all responded past times increasing the amount of information that has to survive disclosed past times firms. That should survive skilful intelligence for investors, but hither are the contradictions that I see:

• If the objective of “disclosure” laws is to foreclose the side past times side Enron, Parmalat or Worldcom accounting scandal, it clearly has non worked, since nosotros seem simply equally exposed equally nosotros guide keep ever been to these problems. If anything, companies seem to guide keep acquire to a greater extent than creative inwards hiding “bad” stuff, inwards reply to disclosure laws, making it to a greater extent than hard to notice problems. 
•  If the objective is to assist investors value companies better, it has non worked either. To me fiscal disclosures are raw data, when I exercise valuation, in addition to I must confess that I discover fiscal statements to a greater extent than hard to operate alongside today than I did 30 years ago, when disclosure laws were less onerous.

So, what gives here? Why guide keep these increased disclosure requirements non worked the magic that they were supposed to? While nosotros tin betoken to lots of reasons, including imperfections inwards the disclosure requirements, I intend that the biggest employment is that the disclosure rules guide keep turned fiscal disclosures into information dumps. To run across my point, guide keep a await at the 10K for a publicly traded company, fifty-fifty a minor one, in addition to you lot volition run across a document that runs into tens or fifty-fifty hundreds of pages. For instance, Procter & Gamble’s most recent 10K runs 239 pages in addition to it is slim side past times side to Citigroup’s most recent 10K which runs to a greater extent than than 300 pages.  If you lot are interested inwards valuing Procter & Gamble or Citigroup, you lot guide keep to operate your means through these pages, separating the wheat from the chaff, or to a greater extent than specifically, information from data. Faced alongside information overload, it is slow to acquire distracted past times the legal boilerplate (you powerfulness equally good throw out the entire department that discusses risk) in addition to the trivial details that clutter modern disclosures. In my estimate, less than 10% (and that is beingness generous) of a modern fiscal disclosure has whatever value to an investor in addition to to discover this information, hither are unopen to things to conk on inwards mind: 

1. Read alongside focus: Know what information you lot are looking for, earlier you lot start looking for it.  In other words, reading a 10K, simply looking for useful information, is equivalent to earthworks upwards your backyard, looking for interesting stuff. Your most probable termination is that you lot volition destination upwards alongside a mount of dirt in addition to piffling to demonstrate for your work.
2. Don’t effort the minor stuff: If you lot are valuing a $ lx billion dollar company, you lot tin afford to skip over that department that describes inwards excruciating special a $25 1 G one thousand existent estate lease that the companionship has entered into or the $50 1 G one thousand lawsuit filed against the company. 
3. Don’t cater to your inner accountant: We know that accounting has its fixations in addition to that fiscal disclosure oft cater to these fixations. Thus, in that place are large chunks of these documents that are dedicated to how intangible assets guide keep been “fair valued” or goodwill has been “impaired” (a mythical asset that exists alone inwards the accounting world). Since I don’t trust accounting fair value judgments to laid about alongside in addition to goodwill has but a peripheral purpose (if that) inwards cash stream based valuation models, I tin afford to skip these sections. 

As unopen to of you lot already know, I exercise instruct a valuation class at Stern in addition to my invite to anyone who is interested inwards sitting inwards nonetheless holds. Since a primal part of doing valuation is learning how to operate alongside fiscal disclosures, I of late topographic point together a webcast on disclosures, where I used P&G’s most recent 10K to value the company. If you lot are interested, you lot tin find the webcast with the supporting textile (the 10K, my slides in addition to my valuation of P&G). In fact, they are part of laid of webcasts I am doing on the nuts in addition to bolts of valuation:
http://people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/New_Home_Page/valuationtools.html

I am afraid that things volition alone acquire worse for investors. The force towards to a greater extent than disclosure, good intentioned though it powerfulness be, is unstoppable in addition to  will create to a greater extent than mass inwards annual reports in addition to companionship filings, in addition to to a greater extent than distractions for investors.

While I am certain that I volition survive ignored, hither are my suggestions to the regulatory in addition to accounting disclosure czars if they genuinely desire to assist investors:

1. Focus on principles, non rules: The principles that regulation valuation are unproblematic in addition to robust, but they seem to guide keep a dorsum topographic point to rules when it comes to disclosure requirements. To render a unproblematic example, upper-case missive of the alphabet expenditures should mensurate what a companionship invests inwards its long term assets, whether those assets are tangible (land, building, equipment) or intangible (human capital, create name, intellectual property). Not alone are the accounting rules governing upper-case missive of the alphabet expenditures unnecessarily complex but they are internally inconsistent, alongside dissimilar rules governing tangible in addition to intangible investments. (Prime exhibit: the handling of R&D expenditures). 
2. Less is more: My wife, who is the "organizer' inwards our house, has a rattling unproblematic dominion for everyone inwards the family. For every novel item that whatever of us buys, 1 item has to survive removed (given away or abandoned) from our closets. It is an splendid rule, since inwards its absence, nosotros would undoubtedly hoard what nosotros already have, on the off hazard that nosotros powerfulness demand it inwards the future. I would advise a similar dominion inwards disclosure. When companies are required to break something new, an erstwhile disclosure requirement of equal length has to survive eliminated, thence preventing disclosure bloat.
3. Target investors, non lawyers: As I browse through fiscal disclosures, I am struck past times how much of the content is written past times lawyers, in addition to for lawyers, alongside the specific intent of shielding companies from lawsuits and/or regulatory backlash. While I sympathise that companies are gun shy most beingness sued, in addition to that this protection is necessary,  it may survive fourth dimension to allow companies to file ii disclosures, 1 for lawyers in addition to 1 for investors. Using P&G equally my example, I could build an investors' 10K, most xx pages inwards length, stripped off all the legalese that the total 10K includes.
4. Let accountants exercise accounting (and non valuation): I know that "fair value" accounting is hither to stay, but  I believe that the push is misguided. By requiring accountants to play the purpose of appraisers, it asks them to play conflicting roles: render a faithful recording of what has happened inwards the past times (traditional accounting) piece also forecasting the hereafter (a primal factor of making valuation judgments). In the process, I intend that nosotros volition destination upwards alongside fiscal statements that exercise neither accounting nor valuation good in addition to that investors volition pay the price.

Looking forward, investors volition increasingly survive tested on their capacity to class the information that matters (information) from the information that does non (noise or distraction). There is an interesting twist (and I give thank you lot Bill, who commented on this postal service for this insight). The increasing complexity of fiscal disclosure does opened upwards up the possibility that investors who tin navigate their means through these disclosures in addition to class information from information volition guide keep a competitive wages over other investors, who compass upwards inwards frustration.

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: