Latepost Developed Versus Emerging Markets: Convergence Or Divergence?

In my concluding post, I looked at province gamble kickoff from both a bondholder perspective (with ratings, default spreads in addition to CDS spreads) every bit good every bit an equity investor perspective (with my estimates of equity gamble premiums past times country). While default spreads inwards sovereign bonds in addition to differences inwards CDS spreads are explicit in addition to visible to investors, the enquiry of whether equity markets toll inwards differences inwards equity gamble premiums is debatable. In fact, at that topographic point are quite a few analysts (and academics) who fence that province gamble is diversifiable to global investors in addition to hence should non hold upward priced into stocks, though that declaration has been undercut past times the increasing correlation across equity markets. In this post, I facial expression at the pricing of stocks across dissimilar markets to run into if at that topographic point is show of differences inwards province risk, in addition to if so, whether marketplace position views of gamble own got changed over time.

Stock Prices in addition to Risk Premiums

Holding all else constant, stocks that are perceived every bit riskier should sell for lower prices. That tin forcefulness out hold upward illustrated fairly only using a basic discounted cash current model. Consider a work solid that pays out what it tin forcefulness out afford to inwards dividends in addition to is inwards stable growth (growing at a charge per unit of measurement less than or equal to the economic scheme forever). The value of equity inwards the work solid tin forcefulness out hold upward written as:

Rewriting the expected dividends side past times side menses every bit the production of the payout ratio in addition to expected earnings, nosotros get:

    

Now, assume that y'all are valuing 2 companies amongst equivalent growth rates in addition to payout ratios, inwards U.S.A. dollars, in addition to that the alone departure is that i companionship is inwards a developed marketplace position in addition to the other is inwards an emerging market. If investors inwards the emerging marketplace position are demanding a higher equity gamble premium, the emerging marketplace position companionship should merchandise at a lower PE ratio than the developed marketplace position company.

So what? Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 unproblematic essay (perhaps fifty-fifty simplistic, since asset growth in addition to payout constant is tough to do) of whether equity gamble premiums vary betwixt developed in addition to emerging markets is to compare the multiples at which companies inwards these markets trade. If emerging markets ascendance higher equity gamble premiums, y'all should await to run into stocks merchandise at much lower multiples (PE, PBV, EV/EBITDA) inwards those markets, relative to developed markets, for whatever given degree of growth in addition to profitability.

Market Convergence: The Pricing Story

To examine how developed marketplace position in addition to emerging marketplace position PE ratios own got evolved over time, I computed PE ratios for each companionship inwards every marketplace position each twelvemonth from 2004 to 2012, amongst an update to June 2013. I eliminated whatever companionship that had negative earnings in addition to divided the marketplace position capitalization at the halt of each twelvemonth past times the cyberspace income inwards that year.

I in addition to then categorized the companies into developed in addition to emerging markets, using conventional geographical (but maybe controversial) criteria. I included US, Canada, Western Europe, Scandinavia, Australia, New Zealand in addition to Nippon inwards the developed marketplace position grouping in addition to the residual of the basis (Latin America, Asia, Africa, Middle East in addition to Eastern Europe/Russia) inwards the emerging marketplace position group. In sum, at that topographic point were 36,067 companies inwards the developed marketplace position grouping in addition to 24,429 companies inwards the emerging marketplace position group. 

I considered diverse summary statistics (the unproblematic average, a weighted average, an aggregate marketplace position cap to earnings) but decided to role the median PE every bit the best indicator of the typically priced stock inwards each market. In the figure below, y'all tin forcefulness out run into the median PE ratios for developed in addition to emerging marketplace position companies past times year, from 2004 through June 2013.

Prior to 2006, emerging marketplace position PE ratios were virtually 30% lower than developed marketplace position PE ratios, but after almost catching upward inwards 2007, the banking crisis of 2008 caused a drib inwards emerging marketplace position PE ratios, relative to developed markets. In the years since, emerging marketplace position companies own got clawed their agency dorsum in addition to the PE ratio for emerging marketplace position companies exceeded that of developed marketplace position companies inwards 2012. The shift away from emerging markets inwards the kickoff half dozen months of 2013 has set developed companies into the Pb again, though the developed marketplace position PE premium (over emerging markets) inwards June 2013 is significantly lower than the premiums commanded inwards the early on part of concluding decade.

Deconstructing the Convergence

The convergence of PE ratios across the globe is striking, but it is worth noting that it is to a greater extent than attributable to a spend upward inwards PE ratios inwards developed marketplace position PE ratios than to a surge inwards emerging marketplace position PE ratios. In fact, this phenomenon is made to a greater extent than explicit if nosotros facial expression at the median toll to majority ratios across developed in addition to emerging marketplace position companies from 2004 to 2013:

The convergence that nosotros run into inwards PE ratios is fifty-fifty to a greater extent than striking when it comes to toll to majority ratios, but regime notation that the convergence is largely coming from the drib inwards toll to majority ratios inwards developed markets, non from a growth inwards those ratios of emerging markets.

Reasons for Convergence

The convergence inwards PE ratios in addition to PBV ratios betwixt developed in addition to emerging markets is confirmed when nosotros facial expression at other multiples (EV/EBITDA, for instance). The enquiry so becomes non whether at that topographic point is convergence, but why the convergence is occurring.  There are at to the lowest degree 3 possible stories (and maybe more).

1. Decline inwards profitability at developed marketplace position companies, relative to emerging marketplace position companies: It is possible that shifts inwards global economical might own got made developed marketplace position companies less profitable than they used to be, thus lowering pricing multiples for these companies. One stair out of profitability is the provide on equity earned past times companies, estimated past times dividing cyberspace income  by majority equity. The median returns on equity for developed marketplace position in addition to emerging marketplace position companies, each twelvemonth from 2004 to 2013, are contrasted below:

Note that emerging marketplace position companies own got had higher returns on equity than developed marketplace position companies inwards every year. While the 2008 crisis has resulted inwards declines inwards provide on equity across both groups of firms, developed marketplace position companies own got almost caught upward inwards terms of provide on equity amongst emerging marketplace position companies, suggesting that it is non profitability that explains the PE/PBV convergence.

2. Declining differential equity gamble premium (between developed in addition to emerging marketplace position companies): Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 instant potential explanation is that the differential equity gamble premium betwixt developed in addition to emerging markets has decreased over the concluding few years. There is a fairly unproblematic machinery for backing out the implied costs of equity in addition to equity gamble premiums from the toll to majority ratios in addition to returns on equity. If nosotros assume firms are collectively inwards stable growth, the toll to majority ratio tin forcefulness out hold upward written as:

Moving the terms around allows us to restate the equation inwards terms of cost of equity:

To compute the costs of equity inwards U.S.A. dollar terms, nosotros volition laid upward the expected growth charge per unit of measurement for each twelvemonth to hold upward equal to the U.S.A. treasury bond charge per unit of measurement inwards that twelvemonth in addition to derive the cost of equity for developed in addition to emerging markets inwards that year. I know that assuming the same growth charge per unit of measurement inwards developed in addition to emerging markets is simplistic, but I volition revisit this supposition later.

For instance, convey 2004, when the toll to majority ratio for developed markets was 2.00, the provide on equity for developed markets was 10.81% in addition to the U.S.A. T.Bond charge per unit of measurement was 4.22%. The implied cost of equity for developed markets inwards 2004 is 7.52%:

Implied cost of equity inwards 2004 (developed) =((.1081-.0422)/2.00) + .0422 = .0752 or 7.52%

In the same year, emerging marketplace position companies had a toll to majority ratio of 1.19, a provide on equity of 11.65% in addition to a resulting implied cost of equity of 10.46%:

Implied cost of equity inwards 2004 (emerging) =((.1165-.0422)/1.19) + .0422 = .1046 or 10.46%

If y'all own got these estimates, emerging markets had an equity gamble premium virtually 2.94% higher than developed markets:

Differential ERP = 10.46% - 7.52% = 2.94%

I repeated this estimation procedure for 2005 through 2013 to yield the following:

The concluding column is striking, every bit the differential ERP dropped closed to null at the halt of 2012 earlier rebounding a lilliputian flake inwards the middle of 2013. In fact, at the 0.50% degree inwards 2013, it is silent good below historical norms.

3. Decline inwards differential existent growth: Now, let's revisit the supposition that I made inwards the concluding department that both developed in addition to emerging markets volition grow at the same charge per unit of measurement (set equal to the U.S.A. treasury bond charge per unit of measurement each year). You tin forcefulness out convey number amongst that assumption, since emerging markets own got non alone to a greater extent than growth potential but own got delivered to a greater extent than existent growth that developed markets over the concluding 2 decades. If y'all assume higher growth inwards emerging markets than developed markets, the tabular array inwards a higher house overstates the equity gamble premium for developed markets, piece understating the premium for emerging markets. I redid the tabular array setting the growth charge per unit of measurement inwards developed markets at 0.5% below the gamble gratis rate, piece allowing the growth charge per unit of measurement inwards emerging markets to hold upward 1% higher than the gamble gratis rate; this results inwards 1.5% departure inwards annual existent growth rates betwixt the 2 groups. 

While the differential ERP is higher inwards every year, amongst the supposition of higher growth inwards emerging markets, the tendency trace remains unchanged amongst the differential value hitting a depression at the halt of 2012. Unless y'all assume a widening of the departure inwards expected existent growth betwixt developed in addition to emerging markets betwixt 2004 in addition to 2012, which would hold upward hard to justify given the growth inwards size of emerging markets over that period,  a decrease inwards differential equity gamble premiums seems to hold upward the most probable explanation for the convergence inwards multiples across markets.

In summary, the shrinking differences inwards pricing betwixt developed in addition to emerging markets cannot hold upward explained past times profitability trends or changes inwards existent growth but tin forcefulness out hold upward at to the lowest degree partially explained past times narrowing gamble differentials betwixt the markets in addition to the globalization of companies.

Implications
The tendency lines inwards profitability, gamble in addition to pricing over the concluding decade are interesting from a macro standpoint but at that topographic point are 3 full general lessons/implications for investors:

1. Reality cheque for expectations inwards emerging markets: For the concluding 2 decades, developed marketplace position investors own got been lured into investing inwards emerging markets past times the hope of higher returns inwards those markets, though accompanied amongst the caveat of higher risk. If the concluding few years are whatever indication, it is fourth dimension for investors to suit expectations for emerging marketplace position returns, going forward. Emerging marketplace position companies are no longer existence priced to generate premium returns, but they are likewise no longer every bit risky every bit they i time were (at to the lowest degree relative to developed marketplace position companies).
2. Markets tin forcefulness out silent over shoot: While it is clear that emerging markets own got evolved inwards terms of economical growth, political maturity in addition to risk, it likewise remains truthful that at that topographic point is to a greater extent than gamble inwards these markets than inwards developed ones. Markets, however, oftentimes motion inwards ebbs in addition to flows, nether estimating this differential gamble inwards some periods in addition to over estimating it inwards others. Thus, a reasonable illustration tin forcefulness out hold upward made that markets were existence over optimistic virtually emerging marketplace position risks, when they priced stocks to generate roughly the same expected returns inwards developed in addition to emerging markets at the halt of 2012 (see the tabular array inwards the concluding section) in addition to that the correction this twelvemonth is a reversal dorsum to a to a greater extent than reasonable differential premium. For those who believe that the reasonable premium is that observed betwixt 2004 in addition to 2006 (when the average differential inwards ERP was 2.5% in addition to higher), this would Pb to the determination that at that topographic point is far to a greater extent than hurting to come upward inwards emerging markets. If y'all believe, every bit I do, that the norm is closer to that reflected inwards the average since 2008 (about 1 to 1.5%), the correction is virtually one-half agency over.
3. Think global, non local: As companies, notwithstanding where they are incorporated, increasingly croak global competitors, it tin forcefulness out hold upward argued that equity gamble premiums volition converge across markets, since each marketplace position volition hold upward composed primarily of global companies exposed to risks around the world. For investors in addition to analysts inwards developed markets, at that topographic point is the unsettling reality that emerging marketplace position gamble is at i time seeping into their portfolios, fifty-fifty if it is composed purely of domestic companies. For investors in addition to analysts inwards emerging markets, at that topographic point has to hold upward the recognition that the automatic discounts that they apply to emerging marketplace position companionship multiples, relative to developed markets, may no longer hold upward appropriate. I volition provide to this number inwards a futurity post.

1. Rediscovering gamble inwards emerging markets: Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 province gamble premium update
2. Developed versus Emerging Markets: Convergence or Divergence? 
3. Market Multiples: Global Comparison in addition to Analysis
4. Global Businesses in addition to Country Risk: Investment Challenges in addition to Opportunities (Still to come)

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: