Latepost Greg Smith On Goldman: An Indictment Of Investment Banking?

Greg Smith, the Goldman VP who resigned alongside a searing indictment of Goldman Sachs inwards the New York Times, has created quite a commotion. Predictably, the responses, which are understandably heated, stimulate got fallen into 2 extremes. On the i side are those who are predisposed to believe the worst well-nigh investment bankers as well as see this every bit vindication for their view that investment bankers are shallow, self serving as well as greedy. On the other are defenders of investment banking, who debate that this article states the obvious (that investment bankers are focused on making money) as well as that Greg Smith is a failed, heart bird banker, having a midlife crisis.

I intend I stimulate got the credentials to last on either side. On the i hand, many of my best as well as brightest students piece of work at investment banks (including Goldman) as well as I learn preparation programs for both incoming analysts as well as associates at many of the investment banks. On the other hand, I stimulate got never been shy well-nigh critiquing investment banks for creating as well as marketing products that add together lilliputian value or for providing self serving advice to some of their clients. In fact, I laid out my corporate finance degree alongside a clear argument that the degree is non an "investment banking" corporate finance degree but i that is structured around how businesses (who are the potential clients of investment banks) should brand decisions. And I halt the class, imploring students who do cash inwards one's chips into investment banking to save their options to abandon, if they uncovering themselves unhappy alongside the grind or uncomfortable alongside the consequences of their actions.

Given that I stimulate got pare on both sides of the game, I desire to await at the most troubling controversy inwards Smith's piece, which is that Goldman Sachs bankers cared lilliputian well-nigh their clients as well as spoke well-nigh them alongside contempt. (To last honest, I am non certain what to brand of "muppets" every bit an insult... I stimulate got e'er liked Kermit as well as stimulate got aught but abide by for Miss Piggy's self reliance...) After all, it is i affair to last shape every bit a ruthless coin machine (a critique that has oft been leveled at Goldman) as well as an solely dissimilar i to last defendant of ripping off your clients.

Do investment banks seat their interests over the interests of their clients? I would non last surprised if they do, but earlier you lot are overcome past times moral indignation, I would hasten to signal out the following:

1. The typical client of an investment banking concern is to a greater extent than probable to last a corporation, hedge fund or institutional investor than an individual. So what? These entities are non just shy well-nigh promoting their self interests as well as I volition wager that, given a chance, they would non only exploit mistakes made past times investment banks but also mistakes made past times their ain clients.
2. The human relationship betwixt investment banks as well as their clients strikes me every bit mutually exploitative, as well as neither side tin be without the other's acquiescence. Let me work i instance of the disfunction that is created every bit a consequence. There is strong testify that many large M&A deals are value destructive for acquiring company's stockholders. While it is truthful the valuations from investment banks grease the wheels for these deals, it is also truthful that the managers of the acquiring firms are only every bit much to blame every bit investment bankers. Intent on spending stockholder coin to gratify egos as well as construct their corporate empires, these managers are less interested inwards honest advice from investment banks as well as to a greater extent than as well as thus inwards their deal-making prowess. In fact, I intend that many corporations work investment banks every bit shields against having to accept responsibleness for bad decisions, alongside "It was non our fault, since the investment banking concern told us it was okay" becoming the post-failure refrain. 

Has this e'er been true? It was maybe less so, 4 decades ago, when investment banks were almost all partnerships as well as catered to clients who did non store around as well as stayed alongside their in-house banks. Before you lot cash inwards one's chips also nostalgic for the one-time times, cry upward that this was only every bit ruthless a world, where novel contest was squashed speedily as well as becoming an investment banker was hard to do, if you lot were non born into the correct family, had the correct connections or went to the correct school.  The "old rich" were only every bit greedy every bit the "new rich" but they did do a amend chore of maintaining appearances. 

Rather than invoke the past times or rails against the present, I would similar to pinpoint at to the lowest degree iii reasons why investment banks stimulate got cash inwards one's chips less client focused over time:

1. Deal shopping: As Goldman gets excoriated for non beingness client focused, it is worth remembering that loyalty is a two-way street. In a basis where clients play investment bankers off against each other, hoping to larn the best bargain for themselves, these same clients cannot signal fingers at investment banks for playing the same game alongside them.
2. Specialization: I do intend that finance has cash inwards one's chips also specialized inwards both academia as well as practice, alongside experts as well as traders who know everything in that place is to know well-nigh narrower as well as narrower slices of finance or securitization. As a result, the people designing as well as trading novel fiscal products/services stimulate got lilliputian feel of where these products check into the larger scheme of things, and, every bit a consequence, when it makes feel to work them (or non work them).
3. Compensation: I do non begrudge investment bankers their income or wealth, but I do intend that investment banks stimulate got tied compensation also closely to bargain making as well as trading success. By doing so, they stimulate got encouraged their employees to larn the bargain or merchandise done, oft at a toll non only to clients but also to the investment banks inwards the longer term.

So, inwards instance investment banks are interested inwards my advice on how to last to a greater extent than client focused, hither is what I would suggest:

a. Hiring: Investment banks stimulate got e'er focused on hiring the best as well as the brightest as well as they should proceed to do so. Some people, though, are amend at seeing the large moving-picture exhibit than others (think Magic Johnson on the basketball game courtroom or Joe Montana on the football game field) as well as investment banks demand to uncovering to a greater extent than of these generalists to residual the specialists.

b. Incentives/ Compensation: Tie incentives as well as compensation to a greater extent than closely to maintaining long term client relationships as well as getting goodness deals/trades done. I know that this volition last to a greater extent than hard to do than the existing system, but it volition healthier.

c. Clients/Customers: This may maybe last the hardest part of the process, but investment bankers may demand to last to a greater extent than picky well-nigh their customers, maxim no to some, fifty-fifty at the expense of substantial profits. 

Not practical, you lot say! Well, someone has to start the ball rolling as well as that someone has to profitable as well as powerful plenty to gear upward the trend. Wait! I do stimulate got a nominee! How well-nigh Goldman Sachs? This may last the perfect fourth dimension for the theatre to denote a revamp of hiring as well as compensation structures as well as come across if others follow. 

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: